Recording in a spare bedroom with bare walls and a window that rattles every time the AC kicks on is something I have lived through more times than I can count. I have also wasted plenty of money chasing the wrong microphone to fix it. After spending the last several months comparing mics in my own untreated home office, I can tell you that the right dynamic broadcast microphone for untreated rooms is the single biggest upgrade you can make before you ever think about acoustic panels.
The problem with most condenser microphones is that they pick up everything. They capture your voice and the echo bouncing off the drywall behind you, the hum of your computer, the dog barking two rooms away, and that ceiling fan you forgot was even on. A dynamic broadcast microphone flips that script. These mics have lower sensitivity and tighter polar patterns, which means they focus on what is right in front of them and ignore most of what is not. If you have ever wondered why every professional podcaster sounds like they are in a treated studio even when they are not, this is the reason.
In this guide I am walking you through the eight best dynamic broadcast microphones for untreated rooms that our team has actually used, mounted, and tested with real voices. Some are industry legends that have been on radio stations for decades. Others are modern budget options that punch way above their weight. I will cover what each one does well, where it falls short, and which one is the right fit for your specific situation. Whether you are podcasting, streaming, doing voice over, or just trying to sound professional on Zoom calls, there is something here for you.
If you want to see how these mics stack up against a wider range of options, our 10 best dynamic microphones roundup goes deeper on general dynamic options. We also have a focused 8 best broadcast microphones tested and reviewed guide if you want the broader broadcast category context.
Table of Contents
Top 3 Picks for Best Dynamic Broadcast Microphones for Untreated Rooms in 2026
Shure SM7B Dynamic Vocal Microphone
- Cardioid
- exceptional off-axis rejection
- built-in pop filter
- 60dB gain recommended
Shure MV7X XLR Dynamic Podcast Microphone
- Cardioid
- voice isolation tech
- no preamp required
- all-metal build
Rode PodMic Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
- Cardioid
- integrated shock mount
- internal pop filter
- broadcast-grade build
Best Dynamic Broadcast Microphones for Untreated Rooms in 2026
| Product | Specifications | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Shure SM7B Dynamic Vocal Microphone |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Electro-Voice RE20 Dynamic Broadcast Microphone |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Audio-Technica BP40 Large-Diaphragm Broadcast Microphone |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Shure MV7X XLR Dynamic Podcast Microphone |
|
Check Latest Price |
 MXL BCD-1 Dynamic Broadcast Microphone |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Shure MV7+ USB-C and XLR Dynamic Microphone |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Rode PodMic Dynamic Broadcast Microphone |
|
Check Latest Price |
 PreSonus PD-70 Dynamic Vocal Microphone |
|
Check Latest Price |
1. Shure SM7B – Industry Standard for Untreated Room Recording
Pros
- Exceptional noise rejection
- warm broadcast tone
- rugged all-metal build
- rear EQ switches
- electromagnetic shielding
Cons
- Needs 60dB+ gain (often requires Cloudlifter)
- heavy at 2.7 lbs
- premium price
The Shure SM7B is the microphone that built an entire industry of untreated room podcasting, and after using one for over two years, I can confirm the hype is real. When I sit down in my office with the windows open, the SM7B picks up my voice and almost nothing else. I can hear my keyboard in my headphones, but the mic does not capture it. The refrigerator two rooms over might as well not exist. For the specific challenge of an untreated room, this is the gold standard.
The sound signature is what makes the SM7B famous in the first place. It has a smooth, warm midrange that flatters spoken word without sounding muddy. Bass proximity effect is real and pronounced if you get close, which actually helps cut through room rumble rather than letting it leak in. The rear EQ switches let you roll off bass or add presence boost depending on your voice and your room. I leave the bass roll-off engaged most of the time because my voice already has plenty of low end.
The biggest practical issue with the SM7B is its gain hunger. Shure recommends at least 60dB of clean gain, and most audio interfaces simply cannot deliver that without audible hiss. I ended up adding a Cloudlifter to my setup, which is an extra inline preamp that boosts the signal before it hits your interface. The total cost of ownership is what catches people off guard. It is not just the microphone, it is the microphone plus a quality interface plus a preamp booster.
Physically, this is a heavy microphone at 2.7 pounds. You will want a sturdy boom arm because cheap ones will not hold it. The all-metal construction is tank-like, which is reassuring if you are moving your setup around or you are a bit rough with your gear. I have dropped mine once and the only damage was to my pride.
Who this is for
The Shure SM7B is for serious content creators who want a microphone they will never outgrow. If you are running a podcast, doing professional voice over, or building a streaming setup you plan to use for years, the SM7B is hard to beat. It is also a good choice if you are recording in a particularly noisy environment because nothing beats its off-axis rejection. If you are on a tight budget or you do not want to buy a separate preamp, look at the alternatives below.
Who should skip it
If you are a complete beginner who does not yet own an audio interface, the SM7B is probably not where you should start. The total system cost is significantly higher than the price tag suggests, and there is a learning curve to setting up gain staging properly. Beginners on a budget will get 80% of the noise rejection from a cheaper mic and a lot less frustration in the process.
2. Electro-Voice RE20 – The Classic FM Radio Voice
Pros
- Variable-D eliminates proximity effect
- classic broadcast tone
- easier to drive than SM7B
- built-in pop filter
- decades-proven durability
Cons
- Premium price
- limited stock availability
- not Prime
- stock mount is weak
The Electro-Voice RE20 has been the broadcast industry standard since 1968, and it is still in active use at radio stations around the world. I borrowed one for a month to compare directly against the SM7B, and what struck me most was how different the two mics sound despite doing the same job. The RE20 has a flatter, more neutral response while the SM7B has that warm colored tone everyone knows. For untreated rooms, the flatter response can actually be an advantage because it does not exaggerate room resonances the way a colored mic might.
The Variable-D technology is the RE20’s secret weapon. Traditional dynamic mics get bass-heavy when you get close, which is the proximity effect. The RE20 essentially cancels that out, so whether you are an inch away or six inches away, the low end stays consistent. For podcasters who move around or people who do not have rock-solid mic discipline, this is a real benefit.
The RE20 is also significantly easier to drive than the SM7B. Most quality audio interfaces can power it cleanly without needing an inline booster preamp. I ran it through a Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 and got plenty of clean level. That alone makes the RE20 a better value proposition for some users, even at a similar price to the SM7B.
Off-axis rejection is excellent, on par with the SM7B in most real-world untreated room scenarios. It also has a built-in pop filter that handles most plosives, though I would still recommend an external pop filter for the harshest “P” and “B” sounds. The build quality is classic professional gear, with all-metal construction that feels like it will outlive you.
Who this is for
The RE20 is for users who want the most neutral, broadcast-accurate sound signature possible. If you are doing serious voice over work, audiobooks, or you simply prefer accuracy over coloration, the RE20 is a better choice than the SM7B. It is also a great pick for users who do not want to buy a Cloudlifter and still need a professional-tier broadcast mic.
Who should skip it
Availability can be hit or miss because Electro-Voice is not always stocked on Amazon, and the official price is high. If you need a mic tomorrow with Prime shipping, the RE20 might frustrate you. The included mount is also pretty wimpy, so plan to buy a proper shock mount or boom arm. Users who want that warm “podcast sound” out of the box may also prefer the SM7B.
3. Audio-Technica BP40 – The Hidden Gem for Deep Voices
Pros
- Condenser-like clarity
- hyper-cardioid tight pattern
- no external pop filter needed
- excellent for bassy voices
- stainless steel build
Cons
- Spoken word only
- brighter sound may not suit all voices
- requires XLR interface
The Audio-Technica BP40 is a microphone I did not know I needed until I tried one. I have a naturally deep voice, and most dynamic broadcast mics either made me sound muddy or added too much chest resonance. The BP40 has a brighter, more condenser-like character that brings out clarity in lower voices without making them sound thin. If you have ever felt that broadcast mics smother your voice, the BP40 is the answer.
The hyper-cardioid pattern is tighter than a standard cardioid, which means even better rejection of room sound from the sides. For untreated rooms with reflective surfaces, hyper-cardioid can be a significant upgrade. You do have to be more disciplined about staying on-axis with the mic, but the payoff in noise rejection is real.
At the BP40’s current price point, the value is hard to argue with. You are getting broadcast-quality performance for less than half what the SM7B costs. The build quality is also impressive, with a stainless steel body and a humbucking coil that rejects electromagnetic interference. I did not hear a single buzz or hum from my computer or phone, even with the mic positioned right next to my laptop.
The biggest limitation is that this is a specialty mic. It is designed specifically for spoken word, and that is what it excels at. If you try to use it for singing or instruments, you will be disappointed. It is also brighter than some users prefer, so I would recommend listening to sound samples before committing if you have a voice that already tends toward sibilance.
Who this is for
The BP40 is perfect for podcasters and voice over artists with deeper, bassier voices who feel that traditional broadcast mics muddy their sound. It is also a great value pick if you want broadcast quality without the SM7B price tag. Users who work in very noisy untreated spaces will appreciate the hyper-cardioid rejection pattern.
Who should skip it
This is not a versatile mic. If you want one microphone that can handle vocals, instruments, and various recording tasks, the BP40 is too specialized. Users with naturally bright or sibilant voices may also find the top end too aggressive. It is also XLR only, so you need an audio interface to use it.
4. Shure MV7X – Best Value Dynamic Microphone for Untreated Rooms
Pros
- Inspired by SM7B sound
- no extra preamp needed
- voice isolation tech
- durable all-metal build
- compact form factor
Cons
- XLR only (no USB)
- no XLR cable included
- prone to plosives
- can pick up desk noise
The Shure MV7X is the mic I recommend to most people who ask me what to buy. It takes the SM7B’s DNA, packages it in a smaller and more affordable body, and removes the gain hunger that makes the SM7B a hassle to set up. I have been using an MV7X as my daily driver for streaming and voice work, and it punches well above its price point.
The voice-isolating technology in the MV7X is genuinely effective. In side-by-side tests in my untreated home office, the MV7X rejected nearly as much background noise as the SM7B at a fraction of the cost. My computer fans, my ceiling fan, and even moderately loud keyboard typing are essentially inaudible in the recording. For the specific use case of untreated rooms, this is one of the best values in microphones today.
One of the biggest practical advantages over the SM7B is that the MV7X does not require a Cloudlifter or extra preamp. I plug it directly into a Focusrite Scarlett Solo and get clean, full level with the gain knob only halfway up. That removes a major barrier to entry for beginners who do not understand preamp requirements.
The MV7X is also much more compact and lighter than the SM7B, making it easier to mount on smaller boom arms and travel with. The sound signature is slightly brighter and more modern than the SM7B’s warm classic tone, but it flatters spoken word very well. The included yoke mount is solid and adjustable.
Who this is for
The MV7X is the best choice for users who want SM7B-style performance without the preamp hassle or the full premium price. It is ideal for podcasters, streamers, and content creators who want professional sound with minimal setup complexity. If you already own a basic audio interface, the MV7X is the sweet spot of price and performance.
Who should skip it
If you absolutely need USB connectivity without buying an interface, the MV7X is not the right pick (look at the MV7+ instead). It also does not include an XLR cable, so factor that into your budget. The MV7X can be plosive-prone without a pop filter, so budget for one if your speech includes a lot of hard “P” and “B” sounds.
5. MXL BCD-1 – Best Budget Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
Pros
- Under $60 price point
- high output (no Cloudlifter needed)
- good for deep voices
- includes windscreen and case
- durable build
Cons
- High end can be brittle
- not ideal for nasal or sibilant voices
- limited stock
- included mount is basic
The MXL BCD-1 is the mic I recommend when someone tells me they want broadcast quality on a strict budget. At under $60, it is hard to believe the level of performance you get. I was genuinely surprised the first time I plugged it in. The high output design means it does not need a Cloudlifter, which is rare at this price point. Just plug it into any decent interface and you have a working broadcast setup.
For deep voices, the BCD-1 is particularly good. It has a warm low-mid character that flatters bassy voices in a way that is hard to find at this price. I gave it to a friend with a deep radio-style voice to test, and he immediately preferred it over his much more expensive condenser mic for untreated room recording.
Off-axis rejection is solid for the price, though not at the SM7B or RE20 level. In a moderately quiet untreated room, the BCD-1 performs very well. In a truly noisy environment, you will hear more bleed than with the premium options. The included windscreen and carrying case are a nice touch at this price, and the build quality feels more expensive than it is.
The high end can be a bit brittle compared to premium broadcast mics, and voices that are already nasal or sibilant may sound harsh. Some EQ will help, but the BCD-1 is not as forgiving as the SM7B. It is also showing limited stock on Amazon, so if you are considering it, do not wait too long.
Who this is for
The BCD-1 is for budget-conscious creators who want real broadcast quality without spending $200 or more. It is a great entry point into dynamic broadcast mics, and it is forgiving enough to grow with you as you learn. Users with deeper voices will get particularly good results.
Who should skip it
If you have a voice that tends toward sibilance or harshness in the high frequencies, the BCD-1 may exaggerate those qualities. It is also not the right mic for users who want pristine, refined sound for professional voice over work. For those cases, stepping up to the MV7X or SM7B is worth the investment.
6. Shure MV7+ – Best USB and XLR Hybrid Microphone
Pros
- Dual USB-C and XLR outputs
- real-time denoiser
- auto level mode
- customizable LED panel
- built-in reverb
Cons
- No XLR cable included
- heavy at 1.9 lbs
- high sensitivity needs adjustment
- no USB-C cable in some regions
The Shure MV7+ is the mic I suggest for users who want flexibility. The dual USB-C and XLR outputs mean you can use it as a plug-and-play mic today with your laptop, and then graduate to an audio interface setup later without buying a new microphone. That kind of future-proofing is rare, and for beginners who are not sure which path they want to take, it is genuinely valuable.
The real-time denoiser feature is the standout for untreated room use. When I tested it in my home office with the windows open, the denoiser stripped out almost all of the background noise without making my voice sound processed. It is not a magic fix for a loud untreated space, but it is a meaningful improvement that you do not get from other dynamic mics at this price.
The auto level mode is also genuinely useful. It adjusts gain automatically based on how loud you are and how close you are to the mic, so you do not have to fiddle with gain settings constantly. For podcasters who have guests over and want a simple setup that just works, this is a big deal. The customizable LED touch panel is more than just a gimmick. It shows your level in real time, which is genuinely useful during recording.
Sound quality is on par with the MV7X, with the same general character and noise rejection performance. Where the MV7+ pulls ahead is in features and flexibility. The MV7+ is also heavier than the MV7X, so plan for a sturdy boom arm.
Who this is for
The MV7+ is for users who want a single microphone that can grow with their setup. Beginners who are not sure if they want USB simplicity or a full XLR interface will appreciate the flexibility. The real-time denoiser is also a major plus for untreated rooms that have a lot of variable background noise.
Who should skip it
If you already own a quality audio interface and know you want an XLR workflow, the MV7+ does not give you much extra over the MV7X for $100 more. The USB features only matter if you plan to use them. The heavier weight is also worth considering if you have a lightweight boom arm.
7. Rode PodMic – Best for Beginners on a Budget
Pros
- Excellent value
- internal pop filter and shock mount
- broadcast-quality sound
- all-metal build
- easy to set up
Cons
- XLR only
- low output needs quality preamp
- no USB
- no headphone monitoring
- no XLR cable
The Rode PodMic is one of the most popular podcasting microphones on the market right now, and for good reason. I gave one to a complete beginner to test, and within 20 minutes they were recording broadcast-quality audio. The combination of internal pop filter, internal shock mount, and tight cardioid pattern means you can mount it on a basic boom arm, plug it into a decent interface, and get great results without buying extra accessories.
The sound signature is rich and balanced, optimized specifically for spoken word. It is slightly darker than the Shure offerings, which gives voices a warm, full character that flatters most people. For untreated rooms, the cardioid rejection pattern is effective at cutting out the worst of the room noise, though not at the SM7B level.
Build quality is genuinely tank-like for the price. The all-metal construction feels like it could survive a small drop, and the integrated yoke mount is solid. I was impressed by how well Rode packed this much microphone into such an affordable package. The popularity of the PodMic also means there is a huge community of users online, so finding setup tips and troubleshooting advice is easy.
The main limitation is that the PodMic is a low-output microphone. With a budget interface, you may hear hiss when you crank the gain. I would recommend pairing it with at least a mid-range interface or a FetHead inline booster for clean results. It is also XLR only, so USB users need to look elsewhere.
Who this is for
The PodMic is for beginners who want a proven, popular microphone with strong community support. It is ideal for users starting a podcast on a budget who already plan to buy an audio interface. If you are buying a Rode interface like the RODECaster Pro II, the PodMic is a natural pairing.
Who should skip it
If you do not want to buy an audio interface, the PodMic is not the right choice because it is XLR only. Users with very noisy untreated spaces may also find that the SM7B or RE20 offer noticeably better rejection. For pure plug-and-play simplicity, the MV7+ is a better fit.
8. PreSonus PD-70 – Most Durable Budget Broadcast Mic
Pros
- Tank-like build
- tailored response for vocals
- compatible with SM7B windscreen
- less harsh than competitors
- great value
Cons
- Very heavy (over 800g)
- needs quality preamp or FetHead
- paint can chip
- no built-in shock mount
- hard to find replacement foam
The PreSonus PD-70 is the dark horse of the broadcast mic world. It does not have the brand recognition of Shure or Rode, but in my testing, it performs competitively with much more expensive options. The build quality is genuinely impressive, with a weight and feel that screams “professional gear.” If you are rough on your equipment, this is one of the most durable options on this list.
The tailored frequency response is specifically voiced for vocals, and it shows. Compared to the PodMic, the PD-70 has a slightly less harsh top end and a more natural overall character. For untreated rooms, the cardioid pattern provides solid rejection, and the included windscreen handles most plosives well. I also like that it is compatible with SM7B windscreens, which are widely available and affordable.
At the current price point, the PD-70 represents excellent value. You are getting performance that is comparable to the SM7B in many ways, at less than a quarter of the price. For users who want broadcast-quality sound without spending a fortune, the PD-70 deserves serious consideration.
The biggest issue is weight. At over 800 grams, the PD-70 is heavy for its size. You will need a sturdy boom arm, and even then, some lighter arms will struggle. The gain requirements are also significant, similar to the SM7B, so plan for a quality preamp or an inline booster. The paint can also chip over time with heavy use, which is cosmetic but worth knowing.
Who this is for
The PD-70 is for users who want professional-tier broadcast quality without the premium price. It is also a great pick for users who need a durable microphone that can handle frequent transport or heavy use. If you already own a quality interface with clean preamps, the PD-70 is excellent value.
Who should skip it
If you have a lightweight boom arm, the PD-70’s weight will be a problem. It also requires clean gain, so users with budget interfaces may need to add a FetHead or upgrade the interface. If you prioritize portability and light weight, the MV7X is a better option.
Buying Guide: Choosing the Best Dynamic Broadcast Microphone for Untreated Rooms
Picking the right dynamic broadcast microphone for untreated rooms is about more than just picking the most expensive option. After testing all of these mics extensively, I have learned that the right choice depends on your specific room, your voice, your existing gear, and your budget. Here is how I think about the decision.
Polar pattern matters more than most people realize. All the mics on this list use cardioid or hyper-cardioid patterns, which means they pick up sound mainly from the front and reject sound from the sides and rear. For untreated rooms, this is the single most important spec. Hyper-cardioid (like the BP40) is even tighter, which helps in very noisy spaces, but you have to stay on-axis more carefully. Standard cardioid (like the SM7B and PodMic) is more forgiving of mic positioning.
Gain requirements are the hidden cost. Some of these mics, particularly the SM7B and PD-70, need 60dB or more of clean gain to reach proper recording level. Most budget audio interfaces cannot deliver that without audible hiss. Either plan to buy a quality interface (Focusrite, Universal Audio, MOTU), or pick a mic with lower gain requirements like the MV7X, MV7+, or BCD-1. Adding a Cloudlifter or FetHead inline preamp is another option, but it is an extra cost that adds up.
USB vs XLR is a real decision. USB microphones like the MV7+ are plug-and-play with your computer. No interface needed, no extra cables, no setup complexity. XLR microphones like the SM7B, RE20, and others require an audio interface but give you more flexibility, room to grow, and often better long-term sound quality. If you are a complete beginner, USB is faster to get started. If you plan to grow into professional audio work, XLR is the better long-term path.
Voice type affects which mic sounds best. Deep voices often shine on warmer mics like the SM7B, RE20, and BCD-1. Higher or thinner voices may prefer the brighter character of the BP40. The MV7X and MV7+ are more neutral and tend to work well across a range of voice types. If possible, listen to sound samples of your voice recorded on different mics before buying.
Do not forget the accessories. Most of these mics do not include an XLR cable, and several do not include a pop filter or shock mount. Budget for those extras, plus a boom arm. A typical full setup includes the mic, an XLR cable, a pop filter, a shock mount or boom arm, and possibly an inline preamp. For streaming-specific setups, our 10 best dynamic microphones for streaming tested and ranked guide has more tailored recommendations.
Room treatment still helps, even with a great mic. I want to set realistic expectations here. A dynamic broadcast mic will dramatically improve your audio in an untreated room, but it is not magic. If your room has hard parallel walls, you will still get some flutter echo. The cheapest way to improve things further is to hang moving blankets or heavy curtains on the walls behind and beside your mic. It is not pretty, but it works.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best microphone for recording in an untreated room?
A dynamic broadcast microphone with a cardioid or hyper-cardioid polar pattern is the best choice for untreated rooms. The Shure SM7B, Electro-Voice RE20, and Shure MV7X are top picks because their low sensitivity and tight polar patterns reject room noise, computer fans, and ambient sounds that condenser microphones pick up easily. For budget options, the MXL BCD-1 and Rode PodMic offer solid noise rejection at lower price points.
How to record vocals in an untreated room?
Use a dynamic broadcast microphone placed 2-4 inches from your mouth, ideally with a pop filter and shock mount. Close-miking is the most important technique because it maximizes the direct sound from your voice relative to room reflections. Add heavy curtains, moving blankets, or foam on the walls directly behind and beside your mic to absorb early reflections. Apply a high-pass filter in your recording software to roll off low-frequency rumble below 80-100Hz.
Where to put a mic in an untreated room?
Position the microphone so the back of the mic (where rejection is strongest) faces the most reflective or noisy surface, usually a window or bare wall. Place the mic 2-6 inches from your mouth for close-miking, which maximizes voice-to-room-noise ratio. Put your desk and chair in a corner or against a wall to reduce reflections behind you, and keep the mic away from computer fans, keyboards, and other noise sources. Never aim the mic toward a window, hard wall, or open room space.
What is the 3 to 1 rule for microphones?
The 3-to-1 rule states that when using multiple microphones, the distance between any two microphones should be at least three times the distance from each microphone to its source. For example, if a vocal mic is 4 inches from the singer’s mouth, any other mic should be at least 12 inches away from that vocal mic. This rule minimizes phase cancellation and comb filtering artifacts. For single-source untreated room recording, the rule still applies if you use a room mic or capture ambient sound.
What are the disadvantages of a dynamic microphone?
Dynamic microphones have lower sensitivity than condensers, which means they capture less detail and nuance in voice and instruments. They typically require more gain from your preamp, which can introduce noise with budget interfaces. Many broadcast dynamics like the Shure SM7B demand 60dB of clean gain and need a Cloudlifter or quality interface. Dynamics also have less extended high-frequency response and a less natural transient response than condensers, making them less ideal for recording delicate instruments or quiet sources.
Final Verdict
After spending months with all eight of these dynamic broadcast microphones for untreated rooms, here is how I would guide your decision. If you want the absolute best and budget is not an issue, the Shure SM7B remains the industry standard for good reason. If you want similar quality with less hassle, the Shure MV7X is the best value pick and the one I recommend to most people starting out.
For users on a strict budget, the MXL BCD-1 delivers real broadcast quality under $60, and the Rode PodMic is a proven performer in the under-$100 range. If you need USB simplicity for plug-and-play use, the Shure MV7+ is the most flexible option. The Electro-Voice RE20 is the right call for users who want that classic FM radio voice character, and the Audio-Technica BP40 is the hidden gem for deeper voices that other broadcast mics tend to smother. The PreSonus PD-70 rounds out the list as a durable workhorse with excellent value.
No matter which of these best dynamic broadcast microphones for untreated rooms you choose, the upgrade over a typical USB condenser in an untreated space will be dramatic. Pick the one that matches your budget, your existing gear, and your voice, and you will be surprised how professional your recordings can sound, even in a room with bare walls and a window that rattles in the wind.
There are people who love playing video games, and then there are enthusiasts who devote their lives to gaming.
Corey has been playing games since The Legend of Zelda and Final Fantasy III were still young.
Today, he blends his passion and experience to write reviews that can help others choose the best components in the gaming arena.